|
Broadband-Hamnet™ Forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Where is HamChat?..
2015-03-29- 06:47:15
|
|
|
ae5ae |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-10-27- 00:47:17
Posts: 144
Location: Van Alstyne, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Where is HamChat?
Normally you don't. But just go into /www/hamchat/data and remove all files with the name data_#############_# (replace # with digits, 0-9). |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Where is HamChat?..
2015-03-29- 03:12:58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Help with DNS/NTP server add on...
2015-03-28- 23:04:55
|
|
|
KB1TKM |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-10-28- 11:19:11
Posts: 15
Location: Central NH |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Help with DNS/NTP server add on.
Yes, the (original) intention was to make the NTP server plug-n-play at any port by including a DNS server on the same Arduino. I had so much difficulty with that since I was learning too much in too short a period of time (NTP, DNS, IP protocols), that out of frustration, I placed the completed (and wonderfully functional) NTP server on one node and pointed all my other nodes to its address. It allowed me to move on to more pressing issues since I dairy farm and it's Spring. I can email you the Arduino sketch if you wish to play with it. As it turned out, somewhere along the way I probably had the entire thing working... DNS & NTP but since the nodes wouldn't lock on due to too extreme a time/date difference, I assumed the worst and got more and more frustrated with my efforts. Now that I know that the NTP server works (after loosening the restraints on the ntpclient properties) I'll retry some of my earlier revisions and report back any victories.
|
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2015-03-29- 05:58:28 By KB1TKM for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Help with DNS/NTP server add on...
2015-03-28- 21:55:04
|
|
|
G0OFY |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-11-04- 13:44:45
Posts: 12
Location: Euxton, Lancashire, UK |
|
|
|
Forum :
General
Topic :
Help with DNS/NTP server add on.
Hi.
I have been reading your posts about the NTP server for mesh timing. I have a couple of questions.
1. Is it the intention to be able to put together a pluggable unit and associated software that uses GPS to get the time/date using a pi or Arduino?
2. If so, is it then a matter of having the unit connected to ANY node as an advertised service on the mesh? Thus resulting in an automatic time/date update for all connected nodes.
This seems to be a good solution and is almost plug n play. Would the concept port to a PC with a USB puck and a software package?
I tried using the Windows time option in XP to use the NTP server facility but I have not been successful.
73 de G0OFY
(Thought I would add a little reference to amateur radio. LOL). |
IP Logged
|
Not as fat as the photo suggests. |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Re:installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco..
2015-03-28- 19:29:19
|
|
|
ae5ae |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-10-27- 00:47:17
Posts: 144
Location: Van Alstyne, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco
Interesting! Holding the reset button between 12 and 20 seconds is supposed to cause a restore to factory and then a reboot (forgot about the max of 20 seconds). The factory load is for when the unit has factory firmware, not BBHN. Afterwards,
you always use the SysUpgrade files.
Glad to hear you got it back up and running!!! (woot) :D |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco..
2015-03-28- 09:45:39
|
|
|
wb2ifs |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-09-01- 12:42:38
Posts: 31
Location: FN18ns |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco
Rusty,
I held the reset button and couldn't cause a reboot. I was hoping to go the tftp route but there was no change in the LEDs as indicated in the Ubiquiti documentation. (no Lamp test, flashing, etc.)
But I was able to fix the problem by reloading the firmware via ssh, scp, and sysupgrade. |
IP Logged
|
Jesse Alexander, WB2IFS/3
Prince George's County ARES/RACES
http://www.pgares.org/
twitter: @pgcares
wb2ifs@arrl.net |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco..
2015-03-28- 09:39:47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco..
2015-03-28- 09:37:25
|
|
|
ae5ae |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-10-27- 00:47:17
Posts: 144
Location: Van Alstyne, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco
Jesse, Try holding the reset button longer than 12 seconds to get a full reset and reboot. There's functionality tied to the reset button and it differs depending on how long you keep it pressed. -Rusty- |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2015-03-28- 09:38:56 By ae5ae for the Reason quick reply function compressed everything. Bleah!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Diversity on Dual Polarity Ubiquiti Devices..
2015-03-28- 08:49:01
|
|
|
ae5ae |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-10-27- 00:47:17
Posts: 144
Location: Van Alstyne, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
Diversity on Dual Polarity Ubiquiti Devices
[n6mef 2015-03-26- 16:06:17]: I want to confirm my understanding of setting the TX and RX antennas to "Diversity" on a dual-chain Ubiquiti device (such as a Rocket) connected to a dual polarity antenna (such as a Rocket Omni). A few questions:
(I'm only looking for facts, not conjecture. No guesses please.)
1) Is it correct that the "Diversity" setting will use one of the chains at a time, whichever is hearing the stronger signal?
That is correct. 2) In a mixed environment, where some devices are dual-chain/polarity (like a Rocket) and some devices are single chain/polarity (like a Bullet), I presume it's best to set the dual-polarity devices to always use a single chain/polarity -- whichever is the same polarity as the single chain devices. Correct? No, you'll want both polarities/chains available (if you have them) as you never know the received polarity should the transmitted signal bounce off buildings, water towers, and other such structures. 3) In a point-to-point link, I presume it is NOT possible to get full-duplex comms if the TX and RX are set to separate chains. For example, radio 1 TX=chain0/horizontal, RX=chain1/veritcal, and radio 2 TX=chain1/vertical, RX=chain0/horizontal. Correct?
Correct because wifi is half-duplex by nature. Also, you appear to be making the presumption that there are two radios these wifi devices, one for each chain, when, in fact, there's only one radio with a high-speed, electronic switch that selects the antenna for the signal. 4) Why can't the dual-chain devices use both chains at the same time with BBHN software? Again, Wifi is half-duplex. Such a capability is not in the hardware so there's no need to handle it i the software. Secondly, presuming I'm not misunderstanding your intention, to do so would require separate radios for each chain which the Ubiquiti devices do not have.
If you really want to use both chains simultaneously, you'll have to talk to Ubiquiti about that and be prepared for a much more expensive node. Once that hardware becomes available, popular, and affordable as well as having the proper device drivers written/available for such a configuration for OpenWRT then BBHN could make it available should our customers show they express the desire for such. Thanks much! Yer welcome much! :) Michael - N6MEF
-Rusty- |
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Re:Patch 3.1.0..
2015-03-28- 07:22:29
|
|
|
ae5ae |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-10-27- 00:47:17
Posts: 144
Location: Van Alstyne, TX |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
Patch 3.1.0
Given that error message either the file name is getting changed, either by you or the computer you're uploading from, OR the Perl script that generates the Admin page is boogered up.
Could you please post a screenshot JUST BEFORE you press the [Upload] button when you get the error message?
After that, please stop the frustration and just upload the full .trx file. :) |
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2015-03-28- 09:46:57 By ae5ae for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Patch 3.1.0..
2015-03-28- 04:12:41
|
|
|
W4GAA |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2015-02-08- 23:20:03
Posts: 5
Location: EM86vm |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
Patch 3.1.0
I am also running the Linksys WRT54 series and have the right file. After over a week of trying to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.1 I am still not able to make this patch work. Can anyone give me any help? Once again would I be better off to try the 3.1.0 trx file as I have not tried that? |
IP Logged
|
Not enough time in this lifetime to do it all in this hobby |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:AirGrid M2 HP Question..
2015-03-28- 01:12:05
|
|
|
n6mef |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-06- 19:44:28
Posts: 5
Location: Santa Clara, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
AirGrid M2 HP Question
Check the release notes: http://www.broadband-hamnet.org/download/firmware/ubnt/310/release-notes-3.1.0.pdf On the sixth page (the pages aren't numbered, jeez) read "DMZ and LAN Port Distinctions". Granted, description of fundamental functionality is NOT something that should be buried in the release notes. In fact, it ought to be visible on the config screen. For example "WAN (VLAN 1)", or something similar. But user documentation is not a strong suite of this project. Michael N6MEF
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :New Metro Phoenix Mesh Yahoo Group..
2015-03-27- 16:02:29
|
|
|
K7DMK |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2014-03-02- 19:10:56
Posts: 7
Location: Arizona |
|
|
|
Forum :
Phoenix
Topic :
New Metro Phoenix Mesh Yahoo Group
I have started a new Yahoo Group as a site to share info on Metro Phoenix mesh activities. We also have installed a few high profile nodes in the East Valley at 2500' ASL and are looking for some connections. Give the group a visit for full information. Let's get meshing..
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MetroPhoenixMeshRadio/info 73, Dave K7DMK Mesa, AZ
|
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2015-03-27- 16:54:05 By K7DMK for the Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Patch 3.1.0..
2015-03-27- 14:42:36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Patch 3.1.0..
2015-03-27- 14:42:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco..
2015-03-27- 09:57:22
|
|
|
wb2ifs |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2010-09-01- 12:42:38
Posts: 31
Location: FN18ns |
|
|
|
Forum :
Firmware
Topic :
installed the wrong patch on my Ubiquiti M2 nano loco
OK. I've mistakenly installed the 3.1.0 Linksys patch on my Ubiquiti nano loco M2! Is there any way to recover?
The router appears to be running, I can ssh into it. But when I try to get to the web interface (http://localnode:8080) I get the following message: "The CGI process did not produce any response" Is there anyway to recover? I've tried holding the reset button to start tftp but the router wont go into tftp mode. Help! -Jesse
|
IP Logged
|
Last Edited On: 2015-03-27- 09:58:10 By wb2ifs for the Reason
|
Jesse Alexander, WB2IFS/3
Prince George's County ARES/RACES
http://www.pgares.org/
twitter: @pgcares
wb2ifs@arrl.net |
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Golden Horseshoe Network..
2015-03-27- 07:21:23
|
|
|
VE3RTJ |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-08-19- 07:21:12
Posts: 49
Location: Hamilton, Canada FN03 |
|
|
|
Forum :
Ontario Canada
Topic :
Golden Horseshoe Network
It looks like I'm going to miss Ham-ex, so I'll miss your booth. Watch for our emissaries from the Hamilton Amateur Radio Club; I've asked them to visit on my behalf. Are there any discussions going on about tunneling? Now that it's dead simple to set up, seems like a decent way to attach our many 'island' nets to the larger mesh. In Hamilton, we have a decent hub at our repeater site, but no members live close enough to connect via RF. You have a better line of sight across the bay to our site than any of us have. Ironic, eh? I have a BBHN 3.1 tunnel server set up at my home QTH with unlimited broadband just itching for a few connections. Given that I live in an area that prevents me from connecting anywhere via RF, tunneling is an attractive feature that I'd like to explore.
|
IP Logged
|
73 de Ron P. email: (callsign) *at* gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :3.1.0 tunneling on a cellular hotspot..
2015-03-27- 07:10:32
|
|
|
VE3RTJ |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-08-19- 07:21:12
Posts: 49
Location: Hamilton, Canada FN03 |
|
|
|
Forum :
Problems & Answers
Topic :
3.1.0 tunneling on a cellular hotspot
I'm trying out the VTUN tunneling using Linksys 54GS's. At one end is a cable ISP with a home router, port forwarding set per the user docs for port 5525, static IP established via dyndns service. That's the server end. At the client end, I'm using a cell phone wifi hotspot linked to the client node via a dd-wrt client bridge setup. Internet access via the client node works ok with the gateway set to on. Other nodes local to the client can access the internet via the cell phone. On the client tunnel admin page, the link is shown as 'active', the little dot is present. On the OLSR status page, the VTUN interface is up. On the mesh status page, there are entries for remote nodes at the far end of the tunnel. Oddly, the name of the server node doesn't appear in the client node's neighbor list. There is an entry showing the network IP for the tunnel.
So, everything looks decent, but the tunnel won't pass any traffic. When I click on the mesh status page link for a remote node. I get a timeout or connection refused error. I've tried two different cell phones, using two different carriers, with identical results. Is it possible the cell phone companies are blocking payload traffic, but allowing the TCP control traffic? I haven't yet tried connecting via another landline based ISP. If anyone would like to try a test connection, please e-mail me at my callsign at gmail.com.
|
IP Logged
|
73 de Ron P. email: (callsign) *at* gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Re:Re:Re:Get Involved!..
2015-03-27- 05:41:09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject :Diversity on Dual Polarity Ubiquiti Devices..
2015-03-26- 16:06:17
|
|
|
n6mef |
|
Member |
|
Joined: 2013-12-06- 19:44:28
Posts: 5
Location: Santa Clara, CA |
|
|
|
Forum :
Hardware
Topic :
Diversity on Dual Polarity Ubiquiti Devices
I want to confirm my understanding of setting the TX and RX antennas to "Diversity" on a dual-chain Ubiquiti device (such as a Rocket) connected to a dual polarity antenna (such as a Rocket Omni). A few questions:
(I'm only looking for facts, not conjecture. No guesses please.)
1) Is it correct that the "Diversity" setting will use one of the chains at a time, whichever is hearing the stronger signal? 2) In a mixed environment, where some devices are dual-chain/polarity (like a Rocket) and some devices are single chain/polarity (like a Bullet), I presume it's best to set the dual-polarity devices to always use a single chain/polarity -- whichever is the same polarity as the single chain devices. Correct? 3) In a point-to-point link, I presume it is NOT possible to get full-duplex comms if the TX and RX are set to separate chains. For example, radio 1 TX=chain0/horizontal, RX=chain1/veritcal, and radio 2 TX=chain1/vertical, RX=chain0/horizontal. Correct? 4) Why can't the dual-chain devices use both chains at the same time with BBHN software? Thanks much! Michael - N6MEF
|
IP Logged
|
|
|
|
|